Executive Power

The Justices are heading into a busy, contentious season. The mood seems brittle.

From tariffs and immigration to the National Guard, federal judges are rejecting Trump’s ridiculous cover stories.

In leaping to defend the Trump Administration, the Court conveniently ignored a long-established precedent that prevented Presidents from firing independent-agency heads at will.

The Vice-President says it’s time for Chief Justice John Roberts to step in and make judges behave. He’s wrong.

The Associated Press had its day in court on Thursday, but free speech in this Presidency is already a big loser.

The Administration’s defiance of Congress and the judiciary has both flouted and made use of the country’s legal system.

A flurry of seemingly illegal orders and firings could tee up the Supreme Court to cement a vast expansion of Presidential authority.

For a potential second term, the former President is devising the greatest reshaping of the federal bureaucracy in recent American history. Would the changes stand up to legal scrutiny?

The Attorney General’s mission to maximize executive power and protect the Presidency.

The Court’s decision tells us that a conservative majority would rather see the case go away quickly than confront hard questions about executive power and Congress’s role.

The Party needs to fight Supreme Court battles in a way that is consistent with its principles—and reject as many untenable nominees as Trump names.